Updating ubuntu 11 04 to 11 10 how correct is carbon dating

Ubuntu 11.04 is apparently not "supported" anymore...

it was not a LTS (Long Term Support) release ( There seems to be an option of "updating" things on "old-releases" (but they are not actively maintained/updated anymore), by editing your source repositories location: https://askubuntu.com/questions/101479/are-existing-updates-available-after-end-of-support.

Why this time they are missing the LDAP module, and during the testing phase the marketplace was not available, is not really clear. But 10.0.0 should never have hit the "stable" release channel at [1].

updating ubuntu 11 04 to 11 10-51

Updating ubuntu 11 04 to 11 10

Wine 2.0 release highlights: For more, see the Wine-Staging usage.

Rico Tzschichholz is maintaining an unofficial PPA with regular Wine packages.

However, if you want to update to a 2013 version, probably the best you can do is to backup your data and configurations and install a new version from scratch.

Pay attention to the fact that non-LTS versions stop being supported after around 2 years.

This was actually causing updates to fail on several production systems that I maintain, but using the option allowed me to finish running other updates.

For anyone having this issue, I found that running 'apt-get upgrade --fix-missing' or 'apt-get dist-upgrade --fix-missing' (I don't know why this works in this situation) causes update to bypass the own Cloud update, allowing other updates to go through..

Again, this recommendation is confusing, because the uninitiated assumes untested software doesn't make it into the stable repository. If what you intend to say is that even when software makes it into the stable repository, you suggest that users hold off on upgrading, then we need more information; which packages to defer?

How to avoid having components of non-production-ready software installed on one's server?

Also make sure that you're not upgrading a productive environment to 10.0.0 and wait for 10.0.1 or 10.0.2 as also pointed out above.

It wasn't clear to me that that's what you were saying, that there's a bug in the repository.

And after the waiting time they probably have sorted out the 404 issue initially reported in this thread.

Tags: , ,